$dunno dice strategy$

But anyways, rant aside, to the tankie and to the book-banning Christian Fascist alike, the enemy has lost all moral status, they are outlaw, and therefore any measure used against them is just, no matter how inherently unjust it might be in and of itself.

'These are our trading partners and they're totally super into freedom, guys! China wants to be like us!'Īnd here we are. Likewise, if you step into a naive geopolitical viewpoint and say to yourself that Russia is a country that lost the cold war and which the West did not really help to become more democratic in the aftermath - you sent your capitalists and that equated to sending freedom, in the minds of Reaganized America.īut Capital does not concern itself with anyone's freedom but it's own, and Capital does business with anyone willing to do business with it, including its morally-liberated, and now ideologically-liberated, former rivals, who were never fucking communists in the first place they were the new autocrats, same as the old autocrats, and likewise, Yeltsin was just a drunky thrown up there to give speeches while they reestablished control under the new capitalist branding.Īnd for thirty years, mostly anyone who question it has been shouted down.

If you step into the tankie mindset for a moment, you will zoom in on the book banning and anti-trans cudgel that's currently getting swung around, and they will contextualize that with our 400 year history on this continent, and pretty rightly conclude that there is no moral champion at the nation state level, and if there is, it cannot possibly be America, but if they're here, America is the one they are able to fight. You're not wrong on any point of that, in the final analysis, BUT, I think it's worthwhile to compare tankies to the current set of kool-aid drinking Christian Republicans who are supporting the banning of books and other overtly fascist laws, because they really are two sides of a coin in this case, and illustrate the breakdown of social bonds we are currently experiencing. It's fine if most people are on million-user servers with teams running them, and it's fine if most people are on family servers that can go down without much negative impact, but this middle ground where people are on ~10k sized servers that individuals without the necessary skills are struggling to keep running on a volunteer basis seems to be a bad middle-ground.

I think the fediverse needs to figure out whether it wants to focus on making smaller servers easier or bigger servers easier. It's different when it's your personal site, but a social network? I want the fediverse to be accessible at that level or even below! It does lead to issues like this though.Ħ7 euros per month is a small server, and a single server is not the best way to run a service that other people are using. It seems like there are a lot more people who are engaging with it on the same level as people renting multiplayer game servers, or installing Wordpress on a consumer-focused VPS provider.Īnd I think this is kinda great. However, I have seen a fairly strong pattern of fediverse servers being run by people with relatively few skills in system administration/web apps/operations/etc. No judgement on you or the dev using 'as high as possible' here, I realise it could be a simplification in this instance. already upgraded the server as high as possible (16€ to 67€ per month)

Dunno dice strategy